<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Design Pattern Principles for ActionScript 3.0: The Dependency Inversion Principle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.as3dp.com/2009/04/07/design-pattern-principles-for-actionscript-30-the-dependency-inversion-principle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.as3dp.com/2009/04/07/design-pattern-principles-for-actionscript-30-the-dependency-inversion-principle/</link>
	<description>OOP Techniques for Flash and Flex Developers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:40:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William B. Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.as3dp.com/2009/04/07/design-pattern-principles-for-actionscript-30-the-dependency-inversion-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-3558</link>
		<dc:creator>William B. Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.as3dp.com/?p=862#comment-3558</guid>
		<description>Hi Loopdoop,

You&#039;re quire right. References are important. However, I get antsy about a reference to Wikipeida (look at some of their examples of Design Patterns, and you&#039;ll know why. Even better, check out their definition of Private Class.) I tend to use several references and then make some kind of generalized statement based on the good, bad and ugly that I&#039;ve found. I am afraid of turning this blog into a turgid academic tome; but still I&#039;ll get my ducks in a row and be better about references.

Kindest regards,
Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Loopdoop,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re quire right. References are important. However, I get antsy about a reference to Wikipeida (look at some of their examples of Design Patterns, and you&#8217;ll know why. Even better, check out their definition of Private Class.) I tend to use several references and then make some kind of generalized statement based on the good, bad and ugly that I&#8217;ve found. I am afraid of turning this blog into a turgid academic tome; but still I&#8217;ll get my ducks in a row and be better about references.</p>
<p>Kindest regards,<br />
Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loopdoop</title>
		<link>http://www.as3dp.com/2009/04/07/design-pattern-principles-for-actionscript-30-the-dependency-inversion-principle/comment-page-1/#comment-3557</link>
		<dc:creator>loopdoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.as3dp.com/?p=862#comment-3557</guid>
		<description>Next time include sources please =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next time include sources please =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
